Money talks

Phil Parry considers the costs of a ‘transparent’ Welsh Assembly and Government.

Good Government costs money.

In a devolved Wales with key decisions over big ticket items like Health and Education by politicians whose wages we pay, this fact is more important than ever.

It can only become more critical too, as an increasing number of elections to key posts approach.

We have already had one referendum over Scottish independence, and all of us are to be offered a chance to vote in another one, on whether we should stay in, or leave the European Union.

Organising these elections costs a lot of money.

Thankfully we are not yet in the position of the US. There, the Presidential elections will cost billions of dollars.

It is reckoned everyone will have spent almost $10 billion dollars by the end.

Hillary Clinton, if she receives the nomination, is likely to have spent about $2 billion. Jeb Bush, the brother, and son of Presidents and once the front-runner for the Republican nomination, may have forked out almost $2 billion too.

These figures dwarf previous contests. They are almost twice as much as Barack Obama and Mitt Romney each spent in 2012.

Transparency in Government too costs money, but is no less important.

I say again – it is worth repeating – we pay the politicians’ wages, so they should do what we ask.

This is one of the reasons why it is so disturbing they are planning to change the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA).

A review of how well the act is working, will report soon and the members of the committee looking at it is stuffed with people who are not noted for supporting the idea of giving information out about Government.Speaking as a journalist you may well say I have a vested interest in this, and I can only plead guilty. The key problem is not the information itself, but making it relevant.

The plain fact is that people are only concerned with getting on with their lives – their jobs, the families healthcare and the education of their children. We all know that politics has an important bearing on all these issues, but for many people it cannot be seen. They only see politicians arguing. This is borne out by figures The Eye have secured.

According to statistics revealed through an FoIA request, Senedd TV cost £40,681 in 2014/15 and secured only 17,026 ‘users’. The TV channel is broadcast over the internet and television and has been revamped in a bid to allow voters to see senior Welsh politicians at work. Internet television screenings are shown on the Assembly’s own website, which broadcasts about 35 hours of content each week in English and Welsh.

This piece gained more ‘hits’ on our website than any story we have reported. The TaxPayers Alliance were, unusually perhaps, measured in their response. They said it was important to keep these costs under control, but it is also vital to have transparency and see how our politicians are working.

Their campaign manager, Harry Davis,said:  “It is important that taxpayers are able to see what their elected representatives are doing so that they can then hold them to account. Of course the costs of initiatives such as Senedd TV need to be monitored and kept under control, but public access to Assembly debates is a vital part of the democratic process.”

They are absolutely right but it is a delicate balance to strike.

One of the central themes of the devolution debate in 1997, was how much a new institution would cost. But it will cost, and is continuing to do so, to govern ourselves. We need institutions like Senedd TV, and we need transparency to see how our politicians are spending our money.

The challenge for politicians remains how to make issues relevant to people’s daily lives.

Phil Parry is Editor of The Eye investigative website.

4 thoughts on “Money talks

  1. Good government does indeed cost money but investigating and reporting their (in)activity (by the IWA, the Eye and others) also costs money. Submitting FOI requests costs money. Getting appropriate legal advice is expensive. These latter organisations run on a shoestring and have a hand to mouth existence relative to the limousine luxury of The Assembly with its highly paid uber-jobsworthies.
    Politicians are reluctant or seem incapable of holding each other to account which is why a strong ‘independent’ Press Media is needed and the lack of this (with few exceptions) is glaring in Wales. I suppose if I were a journalist there are many other more exciting events/places to cover in this dangerous world so this lack in Wales is hardly surprising. However, if a sleepy US State like North Carolina can launch and sustain several actual newspapers properly staffed, designed and funded, I don’t see why we in Wales cannot do the same – the talent is still here. The main issue, with the migration of advertising revenue online, is the lack of a viable funding model. There seems to be more ‘journalism schools’ than actual journalism practitioners in Wales so maybe all those fancy highly paid professors need to come up with new ways/frameworks of funding actual working journalists. Otherwise we will all end up as Trump/Murdoch fodder.

  2. Thanks for a useful and insightful article, with the Taxpayers Alliance quote very helpful. Keep up the good work.

  3. Matthew Hancock MP has announced today no change to FOI.

    Is that power devolved? If it is devolved, the fact that England is making no change should make it very difficult for WG to justify any change that deters people from submitting an FOI

  4. Chris Jones has it spot on. I spent over 40 years in business and an equal amount of time in voluntary work and it teaches you a lot. In 1991 I set up an independent community newspaper in my parish and it grew tremendously with a quarterly printed circulation of 3,000 copies covering some 12,000 residents. I took on the politicos and the establishment. They did not like it one bit. My community team which were all volunteers including myself all unpaid and politically neutral as the paper was to support the Community. I did not reckon on the fact that we became a target for the Council and Assembly as they hated all the FOI requests and searching questions on wheelie bins, incinerators and lack of community facilities. We also set up a Community Development Association. all costs were paid out of the advertising we got from all the local business as we supported them also. We had big plans. The Labour Party Did not like them and they were the worst. We cleaned the police station out of the lazy policemen. We carried out parish surveys on all the infrastructure, roads, pavements, lighting, services. We fought for our schools, we fought unwanted planning applications. The Planning Inspectorate is something that needs a thorough scrapping as its for big business not communities. I think we built a model community team and we were all proud of what we did and it brought the community together in many ways. We protected and fought for our elderly and for the kids. Now the community has no leisure facilities, no library and the road infrastructure is getting abysmal. Both the newspaper and Community Association stopped through exhaustive fighting of the Council and the Assembly. Give them powers I would scrap all councils and the assembly in Wales and have a one body system with two elected chambers and more say for the people.

Comments are closed.

Also within Politics and Policy