Mark Drakeford finds rescuers rather than repairers have the upper hand in dealing with problem families
A deep and enduring dispute characterises public policy towards children and families who come to the attention of the welfare services. On the one hand there are the ‘rescuers’, those who believe that children from flawed families are best removed from them, early and decisively, in order to be offered a fresh and better start in life elsewhere. On the other hand, are the ‘repairers’, those who believe that families are best placed to care for their own and that state support ought to be directed towards keeping families together, rather than splitting them apart.
The ‘rescuers’ have been firmly in charge for a decade and a half. Year on year, since 1997, the rate at which children have been removed from their own families, and into local authority care, has been rising. In Wales, the rate was above that of England at the start of the period, and the gap has widened further over the whole period. A child in Wales is now almost one and a half times as likely to be taken into local authority care than a child in England.
Looked After Children This is the first in a two part series investigating the ever-increasing number of children taken away from their families and into the care of local authorities in Wales. Tomorrow’s article examines ways the question might be addressed. On Wednesday Mark Drakeford will raise the issue in a Short Debate in the National Assembly. |
The rate of increase slowed in the middle of the first decade of the present century. However, the Baby P scandal of 2008 produced a dramatic acceleration which has continued ever since. The rate of increase in Wales has been nearly six times that which has occurred across our border, over the same time frame. Of course, there will always be circumstances in which deliberate cruelty or wilful neglect will mean that children will need to be removed to avoid harm and suffering and nothing in this article suggests otherwise. However, the escalating rate of removal suggests that something different is driving change in the system. Table 1 below sets out the growth in children in local authority (LA) care, over the past decade.
Table 1: Percentage growth in children looked after by local authorities in Wales, per 10,000
Year |
All Ages |
< 1 |
1 – 4 |
5 – 9 |
10 – 15 |
16 – 17 |
(England) |
2003 |
64 |
50 |
60 |
60 |
70 |
64 |
55 |
2004 |
66 |
50 |
61 |
62 |
75 |
65 |
55 |
2005 |
68 |
65 |
59 |
61 |
80 |
64 |
55 |
2006 |
71 |
60 |
61 |
62 |
83 |
72 |
55 |
2007 |
73 |
56 |
62 |
61 |
87 |
82 |
55 |
2008 |
73 |
58 |
58 |
61 |
89 |
84 |
54 |
2009 |
75 |
63 |
61 |
59 |
91 |
90 |
55 |
2010 |
83 |
81 |
73 |
66 |
97 |
94 |
58 |
2011 |
86 |
78 |
80 |
69 |
97 |
102 |
59 |
There are three essential ways in which this growth in numbers can be explained. It could be due to an additional inflow into the system, it could be explained by a slow-down in the rate at which looked after children are moved on from local authority care, or it could be combination of both. Table Two, below, sets out the numbers of children coming into the system for each year, over the same period.
Table 2: Numbers of children starting to be looked after by local authorities in Wales
Year |
Total children |
(10–15 |
16–17 |
18+) |
Incoming |
Outgoing |
2003 |
4,200 |
1,655 |
500 |
30 |
1,650 |
– |
2004 |
4,315 |
1,750 |
515 |
20 |
1,715 |
1,600 |
2005 |
4,400 |
1,845 |
515 |
25 |
1,710 |
1,625 |
2006 |
4,535 |
1,905 |
575 |
10 |
1,675 |
1,540 |
2007 |
4,640 |
1,960 |
655 |
15 |
1,540 |
1,435 |
2008 |
4,630 |
1,965 |
680 |
10 |
1,445 |
1,455 |
2009 |
4,705 |
1,975 |
710 |
15 |
1,640 |
1,565 |
2010 |
5,160 |
2,070 |
720 |
5 |
2,025 |
1,570 |
2011 |
5,415 |
2,080 |
785 |
5 |
1,880 |
1,625 |
2012 |
5,725 |
2,115 |
850 |
10 |
1,970 |
1,660 |
Taken together, the tables demonstrate a number of key points. First, they suggest that the explanation for a rising proportion of looked after children in the earlier part of the period (up to 2008) lies in a reduction in the rate of flow out of the system. Both numbers of incoming and outgoing children are falling, but there are fewer outgoing, so those who are looked after, are so for longer periods. This is further implied by the rise in older looked after children. There is a 64 per cent rise in the number of children between 16-17 looked after by LAs across the whole period.
Then, in the latter part of the period, the ‘Baby Peter effect’ had a dramatic impact on children being drawn into the system. A study by Cafcass, in England, published earlier this year, refers to the “unprecedented rise” in local authority care applications, “since the publication of the Baby Peter Serious Care Review in November 2008”. Not only are receptions into care being made in greater numbers, but “local authorities are making applications at an earlier stage of their involvement with children”.
Cafcass conclude that the Baby Peter effect has produced “a fundamental shift in social work practice”, and one which is set to continue into the future. The figures above demonstrate a similar increase in Wales. The pattern of the earlier period – lower intake, but longer stays – is changed by a huge increase in the intake. There was a 40 per cent increase in the intake between 2008 (figures were published in March, before the review) and 2010, the first full year after the review. As one would expect in this latter period, with more children in the system there are more children going out. But although there have been year-on-year increases in outflow, they do not match the increase intake.
Are these increases uniform across Wales, and are there other drivers apart from the ‘Baby Peter effect’? In England, Paul Bywaters has investigated the variation in the rate of looked after children between LAs, and the correlation this rate and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score for each LA. His figures show that there is a 7:1 ratio between the LAs with the highest and lowest rates of looked after children (Manchester 142 children per 10,000. and Wokingham 20). He concluded that there is a strong relationship between deprivation and children’s services’ outcomes (that is, looked after children), and that deprivation is the central factor in explaining variations between looked after children rates across LAs. As he put it:
“…inequalities in children’s services’ outcomes are not a post code lottery. Nor are they just unfortunate. They represent the impact of systemic social inequality on children’s life chances.”
In Wales a similar pattern can be observed. The comparable figures for the variations in rates of Looked After Children are laid out in Table 3.
Table 3: Looked after children rates by local authority, 2011
Local Authority |
Looked After Children |
Population 0-17 |
Rate per 10,000 children |
Monmouthshire |
80 |
18,841 |
42 |
Flintshire |
160 |
32,635 |
49 |
Wrexham |
160 |
29,055 |
55 |
Isle of Anglesey |
80 |
13,515 |
59 |
Pembrokeshire |
155 |
25,104 |
62 |
Ceredigion |
80 |
12,770 |
63 |
Powys |
170 |
26,203 |
65 |
Carmarthenshire |
260 |
37,614 |
69 |
Cardiff |
520 |
70,850 |
73 |
Vale of Glamorgan |
200 |
27,236 |
73 |
Gwynedd |
175 |
23,678 |
74 |
Conwy |
165 |
21,944 |
75 |
Caerphilly |
300 |
39,533 |
76 |
Newport |
285 |
33,235 |
86 |
Denbighshire |
175 |
19,524 |
90 |
Blaenau Gwent |
130 |
14,336 |
91 |
Rhondda Cynon Taf |
550 |
50,095 |
110 |
Bridgend |
325 |
28,901 |
112 |
Swansea |
580 |
46,782 |
124 |
Merthyr Tydfil |
165 |
12,554 |
131 |
Neath Port Talbot |
410 |
28,209 |
145 |
Torfaen |
290 |
19,819 |
146 |
Wales |
5,415 |
632,433 |
86 |
Overall inequality of Looked After Children rates by LAs in Wales is less than in England (at a ratio of just a little over 3:1 comparing Monmouthshire to Torfaen). But this due to the fact that nowhere in Wales sees rates at such low levels as some places in England. The lowest rates (Monmouthshire) are twice the lowest rates observed in England (42:20), and there are two Welsh LAs (Neath Port Talbot and Torfaen) with rates significantly higher than the rest, and higher than any rates recorded in an English LA. This is further bourne out when it is considered that the number of Looked After Children per 10,000 across the whole of England is 59 (Bywaters’ figure), whereas in Wales it is almost half as much again at 86.
But does Bywaters’ finding hold within Welsh Local Authorities? The data is not available to repeat Bywaters’ study precisely, but an analogous method, derived from the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation demonstrates that there is a clear correlation observable in Wales too. This is shown in Table 4 where a clear correlation emerges between the relative deprivation status of local authorities and their ranking in the rate of looked after children.
Table 4: Looked after children rank and WIMD rank by local authority
Local Authority |
Children Looked After per 10,000 |
LA Looked After rank |
LA WIMD Rank |
Monmouthshire |
42 |
1 |
2 |
Flintshire |
49 |
2 |
6 |
Wrexham |
55 |
3 |
11 |
Isle of Anglesey |
59 |
4 |
7 |
Pembrokeshire |
62 |
5 |
5 |
Ceredigion |
63 |
6 |
1 |
Powys |
65 |
7 |
3 |
Carmarthenshire |
69 |
8 |
9 |
Cardiff |
73 |
9 |
17 |
Vale of Glamorgan |
73 |
10 |
10 |
Gwynedd |
74 |
11 |
4 |
Conwy |
75 |
12 |
8 |
Caerphilly |
76 |
13 |
16 |
Newport |
86 |
14 |
19 |
Denbighshire |
90 |
15 |
12 |
Blaenau Gwent |
91 |
16 |
21 |
Rhondda Cynon Taf |
110 |
17 |
20 |
Bridgend |
112 |
18 |
15 |
Swansea |
124 |
19 |
14 |
Merthyr Tydfil |
131 |
20 |
22 |
Neath Port Talbot |
145 |
21 |
18 |
Torfaen |
146 |
22 |
13 |
The evidence thus firmly demonstrates that Welsh children are being removed from their families at an accelerating rate, and at a rate which has diverged sharply from that in England. Moreover, such children are not drawn at random from the Welsh population. The risk of being taken into local authority care is strongly correlated with poverty and deprivation. Moreover, the pattern is self-reinforcing, as council budgets are used up, almost entirely, in responding to the needs of those already caught up it the system, with very little left over to invest in helping families to stay together. It is to that possibility that tomorrow’s article will turn.